SEO-News: November 3, 2005 Feature Article |
|
To Print: Click here or Select File/ Print from your Browser Menu. |
Article printed from SEO-News: http://www.seo-news.com HTML version available at: http://www.seo-news.com/archives.html
SEO FrightSites: Top Thirteen Worst Website / Search Issues Seen in 2005 By Jim Hedger (c) 2005, StepForth News Editor, StepForth Placement Inc. Everyone loves Top10 lists. In the SEO industry, where search engine results form the ultimate Top10 lists for clients and practitioners, the sheer number of ways a website, document or other spiderable object can be designed makes it very difficult to produce a general Top10 list for best practices. There are however, a number of basic mistakes made by webmasters, site designers and new online-entrepreneurs that inadvertently create obstacles to search placement success. In other words, while it is difficult to say exactly what one should do in any given circumstance, it is fairly simple to say what one shouldn't do. In the spirit of Halloween, here is a list of the Top10 worst things we've seen designers doing this year. 1) ISP Hosted Shopping Cart CMS Template Generated Websites The worst and I mean absolute worst commercial websites to work on are designed using sub-standard shopping cart CMS generated templates. Often designed by micro-businesses new to the Internet, these sites tend to look as if they were created several years ago. In some cases, the templates they use were written in the last century. These CMS systems rarely produce a quality product to represent your products. The advantage seen by new Internet businesses are often found in the "business in a box" solution these schemes offer by enabling website design with a shopping cart and credit-card processing. In the end, the business owner doesn't even get what he or she paid for as monthly fees are often more expensive over time than the development and hosting of a professional website. A quick caveat... There are some very well designed Shopping Cart CMS systems out there that have worked hard to take SEO concerns into consideration. These systems tend to be newer, having been developed and instituted in the last two years. ApplePie from RoseRock Design is one example. 2) Continued Use of Duplicate-Template CMS Systems by Competitors in the Same Industry (especially prevalent in real estate industry) Following on the points above, the use of duplicate content templates makes achieving search placements very difficult. While some content such as name, location and region-specific information might vary; the layout is almost identical as are the all too common shared information-includes. Facilitating the creation of multiple incidents of duplicate content, even if everyone else in the local sector is doing it, is not a particularly good search engine placement technique. 3) Duplicate Content on Multiple Domains Speaking of duplicate content, there is a second, more damaging type of "dupe-content" which continues to be practiced out there. Some webmasters purchase multiple domain names, often trying to protect the brand name on their original one but sometimes in attempt to manipulate search rankings. The problem is, they populate those domains with duplicate content. Like most of us, search engines rarely enjoy reading the same stuff twice. They are very unlikely to give good rankings to incidents of duplicate content. Nevertheless, dupe-content persists, often due to neglect more than intent. A few years ago, someone, (most likely working in the domain registrar industry), said it would be a good idea to purchase the URL for every possible incidence of your corporate name. The logic is sound as it prevents confusion if another company with a similar name opens somewhere in the world. Lots of companies followed this logic and needing something to put up on those domains, they simply replicated content found at their original domain. In the past year, we have seen more than one incident where a global-scale corporation replicated duplicate content across dozens of nation specific TDLs (.ca, .ie, .co.uk, etc...) The correct way to use a number of TDLs is to either produce content that is unique and relevant to visitors from the region each TDL represents, or to use the 301 (permanent) or 302 (temporary) redirect (http://www.404-error-page.com/301-apache-httpd.conf-redirect.shtml) command to reference search spiders and site visitors to the site containing the original content. In previous years, the words used to phrase a domain name had much more influence over organic search engine placements than they do today. That led to the purchase and proliferation of multi-word URLs networked together to blitz the Google algos. Mega-network promotions populated with URLs such as homes-in-walla-walla-washington.com and realestate-agents-walla-walla-washington.com and walla-walla-real-estate-homes.com were spawned and littered the web with duplicate content. Some of that duplicate content remains in use. In one extreme case, we saw what had been a duplicate-content site sold to a new and obviously cyber-naive real estate agent. 4) Leader Pages – Doorway Pages – Customized Ranking Pages Every search engine uses a slightly different algorithm. Google's is heavily influenced by incoming links but considers an array of on-site/page elements. Yahoo is also influenced by incoming links but also considers a wider array of on-site/page factors. MSN is very influenced by on-site/page factors. The other search engines have their own unique ranking tendencies. Therefore, a version of each important page in a site should be designed to achieve high rankings on each search engine, based on the unique ranking method used by each search engine. On the surface, that thinking makes sense. With a dozen or so mini-sites, a link density network could be crafted to please Google's link-dependent algorithm. The method became a primary tool of the early SEO industry when there were eight different search engines to think about. Search engines implemented filters to remove leader or doorway pages, a task made easier after the dot-com crash of 2000 when Google rose to be the only major algorithmic search engine. When Yahoo and MSN introduced their own proprietary search engines in 2004, a number of less than ethical SEO firms began using leader or doorway pages again, sometimes culminating in disastrous results as seen last year when two of the largest SEO spam-shops in the United States got entire client lists banned from Google's database. 5) Link-Network Schemes The client-list bans mentioned under the previous heading happened for a couple of reasons. The first was duplicate content spread across a number of leader or doorway pages. The second was that these doorway pages had been connected together to form a massive link-network designed to game Google's page-rank dependent algorithms. Link-networks as ranking schemes have sprung up over the course of the ten-year history of the SEO sector. The premise and sales pitch is relatively simple. Practically everyone familiar with Google's ranking formulas understands the importance of incoming links. What most people don't fully understand is the sophistication that goes into the way Google and the other search engines judge the value and relevancy of links. The major search engines need to have very stringent link-evaluation tools as pieces of their ranking algorithms. Every search engine using links to recommend new sites for inclusion in their databases stresses the importance of topical relevance between linking documents. In other words, information on documents that are linked together should have a direct or even indirect relationship. Both Google and Yahoo consider the content found on documents that link to each other before assigning a value to each link. They also consider the age, intent and context of each linking document. In order to prevent bogus link-networks from being established, both claim to and attempt to consider the entire link-tree surrounding a URL before placing a value on links found within or directed to it. 6) Hidden Text Hidden text describes a technique as simple as the name implies. By placing keyword loaded text in places search engine spiders will see it but live-visitors won't, ill-informed webmasters and SEOs are trying to achieve high placements through higher keyword to non-keyword ratios or densities. Hidden text often takes the form of poorly camouflaged place names and services tagged to the bottom of documents. Sometimes hidden text takes the form of white-text on a white-background. Other times it can be found in comment tags included in the source-code. A more sophisticated way to hide text is to place it behind a <div> layer. However one tries to hide hidden text, search engines always see through the trick and will tend to apply penalties against sites using it. 7) Sites Designed Entirely in Flash Flash is an incredibly cool design medium that enables animations, sound, video and user interaction with websites. As the web and the designers who work on it become more sophisticated, Flash is being used more often. Unfortunately, Flash files are often used without search engine spiders in mind. While Micromedia did distribute a Search Development Kit to help search engines decode information phrased in Flash files, it is still very difficult to perform SEO services on a site designed primarily in Flash. Sites designed in a coding language search spiders can easily read and understand tend to fare much better in organic listings. The best advice for using Flash files is to embed them in a page designed in a more standard format. 8) Use of MS Word HTML Generator Did you know that a MSWord document can be saved as an HTML document? If you didn't, I am sorry to report it is possible. The problem is, MSWord documents saved as HTML documents have a bazillion or so lines of extraneous code and tend to perform quite poorly in search engine results. They are hard to work with from an SEO perspective as well. Removing extraneous code from a MSWord document can be difficult, even when using Dreamweaver. 9) Poor Site Maintenance, Updates Every town has a storefront that never changes and that store never seems to be very prosperous. Websites need to be updated and maintained, they are sort of like a storefront that way. There are actually two issues being addressed under this heading. Maintenance: Many website owners do not properly maintain their websites. Some sites look years out of date while others continue to carry links to sites that no longer exist. We've even come across some sites with product information for items the business no longer carries. While operating a business in the real world can take a lot of time, the Internet is an active place of business. Spiders and live-visitors need to see a well maintained website to take the business seriously. Updates: We have been preaching the values of regular site updates to clients for years. Adding fresh content to a site is important on so many levels. Google, for example, uses the rate at which new content is added to a site as a guideline when judging the relative importance of that site. Fresh content also increases the on-site inventory of documents that might achieve search engine placements. Live-users also appreciate new content as it adds value to their experience at your site. As many online business owners understand, Internet users are a lot like regular shoppers. They follow patterns and purchase from places they are comfortable. Giving visitors a reason to revisit your site is always good for business. 10) Ignoring Emerging Technologies or Pre-Existing Payment Programs This point follows the maintenance and update point for a good reason. For some website owners, the Internet is their primary place of business. Unlike brick and mortar operations, there is no physical location to purchase items, all sales are made online. That means the website is the store. Like their brink and mortar equivalents, online stores need to use a variety of tools to attract customers. XML based sitemaps that feed information to the search engines via RSS is an example of a beneficial emerging technology that is being ignored by the majority of webmasters out there. Blogs, podcasting, social or industrial networking and the purchase of PPC advertising are others. By ignoring emerging technologies, business owners can miss vast groups of potential clients. Online business is dependent on the electronic transfer of funds. For most that means using a credit card. Some people don't use credit cards and others use them only for specific purposes. There are several types of online payment systems that are not dependent on credit cards, the most well known being PayPal. Surprisingly, relatively few online businesses accept PayPal as a payment option. How many brick and mortar businesses still use an abacus and a cigar box as the cash till? Aside from a few quaint grocers and herbalists in the older part of my town, I don't know anyone else who even knows how to use an abacus. That's the power of technology. There are still a few brick and mortar stores who refuse to honour bank debit cards or credit cards. By refusing to use newer technologies, their businesses either stagnate in a previous century (which in some cases is a welcome respite from the 21st century), or lose customers like myself who rarely use coin or cash. The last three frightening things for SEOs are not on-site related but have an enormous sway on how our industry evolves and the practices we employ. 11) Over-reliance on Google Results Google remains the most important search engine in the world. A strong placement on Google can make the difference between success and failure for many online businesses. Over time, Google has come to dominate the search sphere but as businesses affected by the series of Jagger Updates this month are learning, Google listings can be a very volatile place to do business in. That shouldn't be an issue for webmasters and online businesses as there are literally dozens of other marketplaces aside from Google. EBay is an example. There are other search engines as well. Yahoo, MSN and ASK all offer excellent search results and can collectively drive similar levels of traffic as Google. At the end of the day however, it must be noted that Google offers a heck of a lot of bang for the marketing buck and search users continue to love using Google. It is strongly recommended that webmasters concentrate on getting strong organic and PPC placements at the other search engines and work to cultivate that business. Learning about and taking part in the Yahoo Publishing Network is a good alternative for webmasters and bloggers who want to diversify the advertising that appears on their documents. MSN is about to introduce a series of webmaster and business development features in their soon to be released paid advertising program. 12) Google's Use of DMOZ Information Google is again reverting to DMOZ descriptions on some sites in its listings. This means that Google is querying DMOZ for sites to include in its general listings. This can be a potentially damaging thing for a host of reasons. First of all, it is not very easy to get a site listed in the DMOZ directory. The backlog is huge and editors at DMOZ seem to find reasons to not include sites they feel are designed for marketing purposes only. Some website owners and SEOs have waited for years without word on the status of their submission to DMOZ. DMOZ editors are better known for following the DMOZ system than they are for accuracy or marketing acumen. If a mistake is made in your description, it is often quite difficult to get it corrected. 13) Misunderstanding the Role of the SEO Sector SEOs are not miracle workers. SEO, as a profession is a combination of good website designers and good online marketers. We do not control or even directly manipulate search engine rankings. For the most part, we don't even reverse engineer algorithms any more. We are simply online marketers who have learned a great deal about how search engines work and how they rank websites. Our technical job is to make client sites as friendly as possible for search engines. Our marketing job is to make the site as friendly as possible for live-visitors, to advise our clients about changes in the search sphere that might affect them for good or for ill, and to take action on items that might not be beneficial for clients. We cannot make a site jump from number eight to number three, at least not with any guarantee of success. What we can do is make a website or document available to as many search engine spiders and search engine users as possible. We can help select keyword phrases and arrange them properly on the page. We can help with site design and structure, and leave trails for spiders to complete the submission phase. We can't however tell Yahoo, Google, MSN, ASK or any other search engine to promote our client's sites higher in the organic listings. If we could, we would charge a heck of a lot more. ================================================================ Jim Hedger is a writer, speaker and search engine marketing expert based in Victoria BC. Jim writes and edits full-time for StepForth and is also an editor for the Internet Search Engine Database. He has worked as an SEO for over 5 years and welcomes the opportunity to share his experience through interviews, articles and speaking engagements. He can be reached at "jimhedger@stepforth.com". ================================================================
Copyright © 2005 Jayde Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
SEO-News is a registered service mark of Jayde Online, Inc.